2015 (3) TMI 589
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....is in appeal against the impugned order imposing penalty of Rs. 5,00,000/- under Section 114 (1) of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant was working on the Gulf Airline at the check-in counter. On 18.11.2005 she issued a boarding pass to one Shri Haneef, the passenger who was travelling through Gulf Airline. At the time of check-in as Shri Haneef had no c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on the appellant for omission and commission of their act which lead in smuggling of Indian currency. The appellant is before me against the order of imposition of penalty. 3. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that although the appellant has committed the error of putting the baggage in question in the check-in baggage of Shri Haneef, but the appellant was having no knowledge of goods carry....
TaxTMI