2015 (3) TMI 278

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, the ITAT's findings that the Commissioner of Income Tax lacked the authority to sanction re-assessment proceedings through issuance of notice under Section 148, was unjustified. 2. The brief facts of the case are that for Assessment Year (AY) 2002-03, the assessee had filed its returns in a normal course on 16.10.2002. The assessment was framed under Section 143(1). Based upon information received by the Assessing Officer (AO), a satisfaction note was recorded sometime in early 2009 and a notice was issued in 2009 i.e. four years beyond the end of the assessment year, under proviso to Section 147(1). The re-assessment proceedings were completed on 31.12.2009. The assessee in its appeal urged that the notice under Section 147 was unsus....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assessee on 7.9.2010. The Ld. DR's contention is that assessee did not raise any objection before the AO on this issue. The contention of the Ld. DR is that once the assessee submits to the jurisdiction to the AO then subsequently objection with reference to jurisdiction cannot be raised. The sanction by competent authority, as mentioned in section 151 only can assign proper jurisdiction to the Assessing Officer and if such sanction was not obtained, the Assessing Officer lacked the jurisdiction to complete the reassessment proceedings. When the legislature has specifically assigned jurisdiction to a particular authority under the Act to grant sanction then, if all other conditions are fulfilled, the sanction has to be granted by that v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., who is below the rank of Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner, unless the Joint Commissioner is satisfied on the reasons recorded by such Assessing Officer that it is a fit case for the issue of such notice : Provided that, after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, no such notice shall be issued unless the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner is satisfied, on the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer aforesaid, that it is a fit case for the issue of such notice. (2) In a case other than a case falling under sub-section (1), no notice shall be issued under section 148 by an Assessing Officer, who is below the rank of Joint Commissioner, after the expiry of four years from the end of the r....