Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (3) TMI 202

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or The Appellant : Hemant Bajaj, Advocate For The Respondent : M.S. Negi, A.R ORDER Justice G. Raghuram, President Heard the Counsel for the appellant and the ld. A.R. for Respondent/Revenue. At the stage of considering the stay application, since the issue in the appeal is agreed to be covered by the decision of this Tribunal, in favour of the assessee we take up the substantive appea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red by it. According to the noticee, the ineligible freight was included in the value of the finished goods and, the assessee alleged to have irregularly remitted excise duty from the PLA account on such value of the cleared goods and thereafter to have claimed refund under Notification No.56/2002-CE. 4. After due process, the Additional Commissioner dropped the proceedings by recording the fin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation charges whether actual or averaged. This conclusion is predicated on no analysis of the evidence on record nor adverts to the clear finding recorded by the Primary authority in para 4.4 of the primary order. It is axiomatic that a conclusion to be valid should be the culmination of a process of appreciation of the transactional documents and analysis of the relevant factual matrix and the ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....., J & K; and 53116-53119/2014 dated 30.7.2014 in First Flexipack Corporation vs. C.C.E. & S.T., J & K clearly spelt out and concluded that where an assessee was required to pay duty on FOR price which would include the element of freight from the factory gate to the customers premises, the provisions of Section 4(3)(c) would apply, to identify the place of removal as the place of delivery to the....