Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Case lows of Condonation delay by mistake of Lawyer s clerk

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ase lows of Condonation delay by mistake of Lawyer s clerk<br> Query (Issue) Started By: - pravin bansal Dated:- 5-3-2015 Last Reply Date:- 7-3-2015 Service Tax<br>Got 1 Reply<br>Service Tax<br>Dear sir, I want to case laws of high court for Condonation delay by mistake of Lawyer&#39;sclerkbecause my appeal rejected by commissioner (appeal) lucknow for delay of two days the order of commissioner ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Lucknow was received on DT.10/10/2013 and appeal memo was delivered on 12/12/2013 and hearing at the time 04/02/2014 but no information given by commissioner of related of condonation delay and reject the appeal of same reason Reply By Pradeep Khatri: The Reply: Dear Pravin Bansal, Delay of two day in filing of an appeal can be easily condoned by the commissioner appeals. You may file the appea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l in Tribunal against the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals). We are referring some relevant judgments for your kind information. In Concord of India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nirmala Devi (1979 (4) SCC 365) which is a case of negligence of the counsel which misled a litigant into delayed pursuit of his remedy, the default in delay was condoned. In Lala Mata Din v. A. Narayanan (1969 (2) ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....SCC 770), this Court had held that there is no general proposition that mistake of counsel by itself is always sufficient cause for condonation of delay. It is always a question whether the mistake was bona fide or was merely a device to cover an ulterior purpose. In that case it was held that the mistake committed by the counsel was bona fide and it was not tainted by any mala fide motive. In St....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate of Kerala v. E. K. Kuriyipe (1981 Supp SCC 72), it was held that whether or not there is sufficient cause for condonation of delay is a question of fact dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the particular case. In Milavi Devi v. Dina Nath (1982 (3) SCC 366), it was held that the appellant had sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the period of limitation. This Court unde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r Article 136 can reassess the ground and in appropriate case set aside the order made by the High Court or the Tribunal and remit the matter for hearing on merits. It was accordingly allowed, delay was condoned and the case was remitted for decision on merits. Regards, YAGAY and SUN (Management, Business and Indirect Tax Consultants)<br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ....