2015 (3) TMI 82

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondent : Mr.Satish Kumar, Sr.Standing counsel. ORDER Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat (Open Court) 1. Issue notice. 2. Mr.Satish Kumar, Standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. With the consent of the learned counsel of the parties, the matter is argued finally. The question of law urged on behalf of the assessee/appellant is:- "Whether the final ord....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....charged eventually by paying Rs. 7,52,903/-. The appellant approached the CESTAT. At the stage of hearing of the stay application, there was a difference of opinion; one member holding a view that interest of justice would be best sub served if the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 5000/- as a pre-condition whereas the other view was that the appellant should be heard only on the payment of Rs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....upon the decision of Madras High Court in Unirols Airtex vs. Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore 2013 (296) ELT 449 (Mad.), and Gujrat High Court Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Harish Silk Industries 2013 (288) ELT 74 (Guj.) 7. This Court has carefully considered the submissions. It is a matter of record that the duty liability was discharged in the present instance along w....