2015 (2) TMI 918

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....P.K. Das; 1. These appeals are arising out of a common order and therefore, all are taken up together for disposal. 2. None appeared on behalf of the appellants. There is no application for adjournment on the record.  It is seen that the matter was adjourned on earlier occasions and old one, and therefore I take up the appeals for hearing.  3. The relevant facts of the case, in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndraprakash Lalchand Agarwal, Shri Premprakash Lalchand Agarwal, Power of Attorney Holder of M/s Radhey Krishna Textile Mills and Shri Sanjeev Premhans Agarwal of M/s Radhey Krishna Textile Mills. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of duty of Rs. 12,78,000.00 along with interest and penalty of equal amount on Appellant  No.1 and also imposed penalty of Rs. 50,000.00 on Shri Chand....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the case of CCE Surat-I Vs Neminath Fabrics Pvt.Ltd.  2010 (256) ELT 369 (Guj.).  5. After hearing the ld.Authorised Representative for the Revenue and on perusal of the records, I find that the appellants, in the grounds of appeal, contended that the case was made out only on the basis of statement and no other documents are available for arriving the demand of duty.  It is al....