2015 (2) TMI 874
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ate For The Respondent : Ms. Suchitra Sharma, DR ORDER 1. Heard both sides. Ld. Advocate submits that they had been denied Cenvat credit of Rs. 1,51,759/- pertaining to outdoor catering service and Rs. 42,724/- pertaining to rent on immovable properties on the ground that these services used for installation of tower do not have nexus with their output services. The ld. Advocate states th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....essentially to the effect that the credit on out door catering service is admissible. 2. I have considered the submissions from both the sides. I find that in an inter partes order dated 23.04.2014 (supra) the cenvat credit on outdoor catering services in identical circumstances though for a previous period had been permitted. I am not inclined to not follow the precedent of the said CESTAT ord....
TaxTMI