2015 (2) TMI 598

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent : Shri Anil Balani, Adv. JUDGEMENT Per: P R Chandrasekharan: 1. Revenue is in appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 319 (Gr.IIA)/2009(JNCH) dated 15/06/2009 passed by Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai, wherein he has set aside the order of the adjudicating authority enhancing the value of the imported goods, namely, "Toners" from US $ 4.25 per Kg to US $ 6.80 p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the order passed by the lower appellate authority is fair and reasonable and cannot be assailed without any evidence. While the Revenue concedes that there can be discount of account of higher quantum of imports, no evidence has been led by the Revenue to substantiate that the discount of 37.5% in the price noticed in the present import is unreas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of 5 MT which was part of an order for 100 MT and the imports were done directly from the manufacturer. It is a normal trade practice that when higher quantities are offered for sale, discounts are given and therefore, while comparing the values of the transaction value of contemporaneous imports, adjustments have to be made for the quantity involved. There is no evidence led by the Revenue to sh....