Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (1) TMI 726

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is appeal has been filed by Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. 186/BPL/2008 dated 1.12.2008 in terms of which the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the refund claim of Rs. 1,47,900/- to the appellants setting aside the Order-in-Original No. 1/ST/AC/REFUND/SGR/2008 dated 26.8.2008 which rejected the appellants refund claim mainly on account of unjust enrichment and also stating that apart from unjust....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cedural violations are not sufficient for denying the substantial claim instead of holding the refund admissible without a proper examination. In the memorandum of cross-objections the appellants have essentially argued that they had submitted a Chartered Accountants certificate that they did not pass on the burden and therefore the unjust enrichment is not applicable in their case. 3. We have....