2015 (1) TMI 667

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1. Heard Sri S.C. Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Ramesh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel for respondents. 2. Admittedly petitioner could not comply with the requirement of pre-deposit of disputed tax which is condition precedent for entertaining the appeal under Section 35 (F) of Central Excise Tax Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as ?Act, 1944?). It is also not disputed th....