2015 (1) TMI 460
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....i, JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Vinay Jain, CA For the Respondent : Dr B S Meena, Addl. Commr. (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: Ashok Jindal: The appellants are in appeals against the impugned order wherein service tax demand has been confirmed against them for the period 16.8.2002 till March 2012 under the category of Storage and Warehousing Services. 2. The brief facts of the case are that ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(102) of the Finance Act, 1994 therefore, impugned proceedings were initiated against the appellant and impugned demands have been confirmed by way of the impugned orders. The appellant is in challenge before us against the said orders. 3. The Ld. Chartered Accountant appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant is merely renting storage tank and they are not storage and ware....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hem. In these circumstances, it is prayed that impugned orders and to be set aside. He also took the support of the decision of this Tribunal in the case ofIndian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa - 2014-TIOL-729-CESTAT-MUM. 4. On the other hand, Ld. A.R. opposed the contention of the Ld. Chartered Accountant and submits that in this case the storage tank is well with....
TaxTMI