Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (1) TMI 211

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and K.P. Anil Kumar, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri V.C. Khole, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER The appellants are in appeals against the impugned order imposing penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. 2. Brief facts of the case are that in the year 1994, two containers were intercepted by the Customs Officers. On examination it was found to contain masoor da....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ance Industries Ltd. In the proceedings, the main allegation against the Reliance Industries Ltd., is that they were involved in the activity of smuggling of masoor dal in the guise of POY. While adjudicating this matter the adjudicating authority has observed against the Reliance Industries Ltd., is as under :- "I find that imposition of penalty once again in respect of the same is not tenable....