2013 (5) TMI 770

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the respondents. JUDGMENT Heard Sri Rishi Raj Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C. B. Tripathi, learned special counsel for the respondents. Present writ petition has been filed against penalty order dated September 10, 2009 passed under section 54(5) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act for the assessment year 2008-09. It is not necessary for us to notice the facts o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on is not attracted. Submission is well-founded. However, a bare perusal of the impugned order would show that after giving the above notice under the aforesaid provision, the penalty order has been framed under section 54(1), Sl. No. 5. It reads as follows: S. No. Wrong Amount of penalty (1) (2) (3) 5. Where the dealer has,- (i) failed to issue or has deliberately not i....