Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1985 (4) TMI 289

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....alcutta. After the coming into existence of the Tribunal, the said revision application stands transferred to the Tribunal under Section 13 /B of the Customs Act, 1962 to be disposed of as an appeal. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that Agfa-Gevaert India Ltd. had imported a consignment of 8 cases copyline films and claimed refund of duty on the ground that the goods were found to be damaged/deteriorated before clearance. The claim of refund of duty was against Bill of Entry No. DI-508, dated 10th July, 1979 per s.s. Indian Prestige, Rot. No. 364/79, Line No. 286. The learned Asstt. Collector of Customs found that there was no report of Shed Appraiser on the reverse of the duplicate bill of entry about damage and deteriorati....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....an accident and a collision had taken place on the 16th April, 1979 with other vessel and the material was brought to the Calcutta Port by a sister vessel. Sea water had entered into the vessel and the material was damaged and the same stands confirmed as per Steamer Agent's letter dated 6th June, 1979. He has further pleaded that as soon as the goods were found to be damaged, the appellant had duly applied for survey and survey report also confirmed the same. He has also stated that the damage was not recorded on the bill of entry by the appraiser and the appellant was advised that the same is to be done after the chemical report. It has been further pleaded that the appellant's refund amount is Rs. 99,827.42. The payment was made on the 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....damage, when the damage has taken place, what is the law on abatement of duty on damaged goods. He has pleaded that the appellant has not been able to satisfy these conditions as per provisions of Section 22 of the Customs Act, 1962. The same is reproduced as under: "22. Abatement of duty on damaged or deteriorated goods - (1) Where it is shown to the satisfaction of the Assistant Collector of Customs - (a) that any imported goods had been damaged or had deteriorated at any time before or during the unloading of the goods in India; or (b) that any imported goods, other than warehoused goods, had been damaged at any time after the unloading thereof in India but before their examination under Sec. 17, on accoun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ustoms duty has to be levied on the ground `imported into India' and the definition of 'import' as per sub-section (23) of Section 2 is : "`Import", with its grammatical variations and cognate expression, means bringing into India from a place outside India;" The learned JDR has pleaded that Sections 13, 22 and 23 relates to the abatement of duty. Section 13 of the Customs Act, 1962 deals with pilferage, Section 22 of the Customs Act, 1962 deals with abatement of duty on damaged or deteriorated goods. He has further pleaded that Section 22(1)(a) does not apply in this case as there is no evidence when the damage had taken place and the value of the damaged goods has not been ascertained. The Steamer Agent's survey was conducted on 7th....