1984 (12) TMI 306

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in, for the Appellants. Shri A.S. Sunder Rajan, D.R., for the Respondent. ORDER Originally preferred as a Revision Application before the Central Government, now on transfer to this Tribunal, the matter is being treated as an appeal by us. 2. The appeal is directed against order-in-Appeal bearing C.No. 137-C.E/APPL/JPR/79, dated 2-5-1981 (Order-in-Appeal No. 9/JPR/C.E./81 dated 2-5-198....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....referred as a Revision Application) was not at all maintainable in law. Shri Sunder Rajan submitted that the present appeal deserved to be dismissed on this preliminary ground. Shri Jain, the learned counsel for the appellants took us over the facts of the case and referred to the earlier adjudication by the Assistant Collector with reference to which appellate order dated 2-5-1981 was passed. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... dated 2-5-1981 passed by the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi, still survives and the appellants are entitled to challenge the same. 4. We have heard the learned counsel with great attention. We are unable, however, to accept his contention that the order dated 2-5-1981 passed by the Appellate Collector of Central Excise still survives. The order dated 2-5-1981 passed by the Ap....