2010 (8) TMI 885
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... SDR, for the Appellant. None, for the Respondent. ORDER Being aggrieved with the order passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has filed the present appeal. We have heard the learned SDR Shri R.S. Sangia for the Revenue. Nobody appeared for the respondent. 2. As per facts on record, the appellant unit is engaged in the manufacture of twisted yarn, fabrics/sarees/dress materials....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... was issued to the appellant proposing to recover duty and imposition of penalty, interest, etc. The said show cause notice was adjudicated vide impugned order-in-original, wherein duty of Rs. 15,84,141/- confirmed against the appellant along with imposition of penalty of identical amount and confirmed the interest. 3. On an appeal against the above order, the Commissioner (Appeals) set as....
TaxTMI