Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (11) TMI 180

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....;. 2. The facts are not in dispute. The assessee was engaged in the manufacture and sale of IMFL products. In the early 1980's in order to get rid of militant labour, the assessee let out the entire factory along with excise licence and certain plant and machineries to the lessee, M/s McDowell and Company. The assessee filed his returns showing the said income under the heading 'profits and gains of business or profession'. Assessment orders were passed on that basis for the assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99. The assessee was assessed accordingly. However, proceedings were initiated for re-opening of the assessment on the ground that the said income should have been assessed as 'income from other sources'. The asse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... tax the rental income received by the assessee for letting out the business with the assets (building, plant and machinery, furniture and fitting) to M/s. Mc. Dowell & Co., Ltd., under the head "income from other sources" based on the Apex Court judgment reported in 26 ITR 765 (SC)? 2. Whether the Tribunal was correct in not taking into consideration the fact that M/s. Mysore Wine Products Ltd., (assessee) which was let out to M/s. Mc. Dowell Spirits Ltd., was later amalgamated and was renamed as M/s. Mc. Dowell & Co. Ltd.? 6. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 7. Section 56(2) (iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 reads as under:- "56. Income from other sources.- (1) xxx xxx xxx (2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....be said that an asset which was acquired and used for the purpose of the business ceased to be a commercial asset of that business as soon as it was temporarily put out of use or let out to another person for use in his business or trade. The yield of income by a commercial asset was the profit of the business irrespective of the manner in which that asset was exploited by the owner of the business. He was entitled to exploit it to the best advantage and he might do so either . by using it himself personally or by letting it out to somebody else. The view that in order to constitute business income, the commercial asset must at the time it was let out be in a condition to be used as a commercial asset by the assessee himself was not correct....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tended to be exploited by the assessee or whether it was intended to be used by letting it out for a temporary period. It depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. When the intention was not to part with the assets, but to lease it out for a temporary period as a part of exploitation, it could not be said that no business was carried on and the income derived by the Company from letting out the machinery was only rental income. There was a temporary suspension of business for a temporary period with the object of tiding over the crisis condition. There was never any act indicating that the company never intended to carry on the business in the future. 12. In such circumstances, the income derived by way of lease rent from th....