TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1983 (9) TMI 282
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or the Appellants. Shri A.K. Jain, SDR, for the Respondent. ORDER These appeals are against Order-in-Appeal No. C-589/590/BII-132-133/83, dated 17-3-1983. By this order the Appellate Collector of Central Excise ordered that the liquid paraffin IP grade should be assessed after labelling and packing under Item 14E of Central Excise, since the product was of pharmaceutical grade and that the para....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iff before its packing and labelling. 2. At the hearing before the Tribunal on 2-9-1983 the counsel for the appellants argued that the goods were sold in drums of 200 litres or more and were of Indian pharmaceutical grade. Even if the drums carried the name of M/s. Lubri-chem it will not make the liquid paraffin patent or proprietary medicine liable to be assessed under Item 14E. The goods s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e is the assessment of the packed liquid paraffin under Item 14E-Central Excise. This item covers patent and proprietary medicines not containing alcohol, opium, Indian hemp or other narcotic drugs or other narcotics other than those medicines which are exclusively Ayurvedic, Unani, Sidha, Homoeopathic. The item carries an explanation which specifies that if any drug or medicinal preparation in wh....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....name or any container containing a medicine, a drug or preparation makes the contents of such container liable to be assessed as a patent and proprietary medicine. There can be no distinction simply because these goods were packed in large drums of 200 ltr. capacity or more. 5. We are inclined to agree with the learned Counsel for the department that the use of a name on the drums so that th....