Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (10) TMI 672

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., D.R., for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - After hearing both sides, we find that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of oils falling under Chapter 15 of Central Excise Tariff Act. They imported one reverse osmosis machine from China and filed bill of entry dated 13-3-2008 describing the goods as water supply projects for by claiming classification of the same....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ch culminated into passing of impugned order by the original adjudicating authority confirming the demand of Rs. 2,36,389/-. However, no penalty was imposed. The said order of the original adjudicating authority was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) and hence the present appeal. 2. We find that the Commissioner (Appeals) passed a detailed order dealing with each and every contention of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xpansion means which will increase installed capacity in respect of the appellant manufacturing unit. The appellant in the present case is manufacturing oil and admittedly the RO machine is not increasing the capacity for production of oil. As such, we do not agree with the ld. Advocate's contention. Secondly the appellants have not produced any evidence on record that installation of RO machine i....