TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2014 (10) TMI 666
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....1991-92 and ITA No. 4784/Ahd/1995 for the A.Y. 1992-93, which are admitted by this court to consider the following substantial question of law: "Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the accrued interest added by the Assessing Officer, when amounts were advanced by the Assessee to Shri Budh Holdings & Trading Co. (P) Ltd and Shri Bahi & Co. (P) Ltd. and when the Assessee was maintaining Mercantile System of Accounting ?" 2. The brief facts of Tax Appeal No. 11 of 2002 are that the return of income is filed on 31.12.1992 declaring loss of Rs. 1,62,337. The return has been processed under sec. 143(1) of the IT Act, 1961 on 16.3.1993 and refund of Rs. 1,080/- is adjusted against the demand of A.Y. 1985-8....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....The assessee has disclosed income from dividend and interest. It is found that the assessee has disclosed interest income at Rs. 4,20,501. On verification of details, it is found that the assessee has advanced Rs. 12,11,937/- to Shri Bahel & Co. Pvt. Ltd. and Rs. 16,36,116/- to Shri Budh Holding & Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. The opening balance as per copies of accounts filed remains consistent through out the year. The assessee is entitled to interest at the rate of 15%p.a. In view of this, the assessee is entitled to receive an interest of Rs. 1,81,790/- in the case of Shri Bahel & Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Rs. 2,45,117/- in the case of Shri Buddh Holding & Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. As against this, the assessee has disclosed interest receivable at Rs. 1,80,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or the respective parties and considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the respective parties. 6. The learned advocate Mr. Bhatt appearing for the appellant-Revenue has contended that the learned Tribunal has committed an error in not accepting the concurrent finding of the A.O. and CIT(A), wherein, the addition made by the A.O. was accepted. It is also contended that in view of mercantile system adopted by the assessee, the reasons given in para-6 at page - 32 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) are just and proper and the appeals are rightly dismissed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Ahmedabad. Para-6 reads as under: "6. I have carefully considered the above. Certain peculiar features emerge from the su....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....interest as per assessee's books debtor's books 1989-90 1,44,246 (Incl. TDS 30291) 1,45,356 (Incl. TDS 30292) 1990-91 2,19,593.25 (Incl. TDS 47432) 2,02,500 (Incl. TDS 47432) 1991-92 2,02,500 (Incl. TDS 46575) 2,02,500 Incl. TDS 46575) Shri Bahl & Co. Pvt.Ltd. 1989-90 1,06,849.27 (Incl. TDS 35135) 1,50,000 (Incl. TDS 35135) 1990-91 1,80,000 (Incl. TDS 41400) 1,50,000 (Incl. TDS 41400) 1991-92 Nil Nil 1992-93 13,50,537.65 13,08,698 Closing Balance 7. He has further contended that the learned Tribunal while considering the appeal, has not treated the appeal as appeal but treated as if it is under original jurisdiction. He ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....her as proposed or otherwise. In the fact situation when on similar facts the issue stands concluded in favour of one assessee and there is nothing on record to suggest that the aforesaid order dated April 16, 1990, in the case of Sercon P. Ltd. has been challenged further, the order made by the apex court in the case of Union of India vs. Kaumudini Narayan Dalai [2001] 249 ITR 219 (SC), wherein, it is held that "it is not open to the Revenue to accept the judgment in the case of one assessee and challenge its correctness in the case of other assessee without just cause" applies with full force. No distinguishing feature has been pointed out and hence in the absence of any just cause the question referred to the court requires to be answere....