2014 (9) TMI 871
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....M/s. R. Hemalatha For the Respondent : Mr. A. R. Jayaprathap ORDER Mr. A. R. Jayaprathap, learned Government Advocate (Taxes) takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent, all these Writ Petitions taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself. 2. The petitioners have come up with the present Writ Petitions to quash the order dated 07.06.2014 passed by the responde....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssed the impugned order. Hence, the present writ petitions. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that identical orders have been passed for the eight assessment years on the very same day, stating that the show cause notice dated 25.04.2014 sent to the petitioner was returned by the postal authorities as 'No such Metal Pvt.Ltd.' in the given address. Hence, the proposal wa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed tax amount for each of the assessment years, to show its bona fides. 4. Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents on the above submissions, who would submit that the authority has in fact passed the impugned orders without serving the notice on the petitioner for all the eight assessment years. However, he would state that on payment of some amount, the mat....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s remitted back to the authority concerned for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity to the petitioner to file its objections, however subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall file its objections, within a period of fifteen days from today [without waiting for the order copy] and as the demand is huge for all the assessment years, the petitioner is permitted to....
TaxTMI