2014 (9) TMI 551
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nding Counsel ORDER The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition challenging a condition imposed by the second respondent for the grant of stay pending disposal of an appeal. 2. Heard Mr.B.Sivaraman, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr.T. Pramod Kumar Chopda, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents. 3. The petitioner sold a property, on which, capital ga....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of the demand. Not satisfied with the deduction made by the second respondent, the petitioner is before this Court. 5. Citing the decisions of the Delhi High Court in Soul Vs. Deputy CIT [(2010) 323 ITR 305] and the Bombay High Court in Nishith Madanlal Desai Vs. CIT [(2012) 345 ITR 545], the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that once the financial crunch of the petitioner is accept....
TaxTMI