2014 (8) TMI 854

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....For the Respondent : None PER : R K Singh This order is being passed in respect of the following two appeals filed by Revenue (i) Appeal No. ST/488/2009-CU[DB] filed against Order-In-Appeal No.12,13-ST/ALLD/2009 dated 16/03/2009 passed in respect of M/s. Dwivedi Travels dropping the service tax demand of Rs. 4,59,007/- (along with interest & penalties) which was confirmed along with interest....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....not pay the impugned service tax during April 2002 to March 2006. The Original adjudicating authority confirmed the aforementioned demands alongwith interest and penalties. But the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the aforesaid Orders-In-Original holding that the service provided by respondents did not fall under the category of Tour Operator Service. 3. The Revenue in its appeals has contended....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....4. No one appeared on behalf of the respondents. 5. We have considered the facts and contentions of Revenue. It is seen that the issue involved in these appeals is squarely covered in favour of Revenue in the CESTAT final order No.ST/A/56363-56364/2013-CU[DB] dated 02.05.2013 in case of Anil Kumar Agnihotri and other Vs. CCE Kanpur and also in the CESTAT final order No.ST/A/57778-57779/2013-CU[....