1982 (5) TMI 184
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....as challenged the order No. ERIS/CC/107(9) Bang/77/339 dated 13th April, 1977 (Exhibit-B) of the respondent. 2.  Against the order No. 58/76 dated 31-1-1977 of the Chief Enforcement Officer, Emergency Risks Insurance, Bangalore (Exhibit-A) made under the provisions of the Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the petitioner lodged an appeal befor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n Process Chemical Laboratory (P) Limited, Bangalore v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Karnataka, Bangalore [1978(2) I.L.R. (Karnataka) p. 1645]. 4.  As early as on 17-2-1977 the respondent has been served. But, so far the respondent has remained absent and not represented. 5.  The allegation of the petitioner is that it received the order copy of the original authority ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....as to be construed as an agent of the appellate authority. In Indian Process Chemical Laboratory's case, Raja Jois, J. has also held that the date on which payment due to an authority under an enactment is made by a cheque and sent by post should be construed as the date on which the payment is actually made. In my view, the principle enunciated in Indian Process Chemical Laboratory's case, though....
TaxTMI