2014 (8) TMI 581

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant. Shri K.K. Jaiswal, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER This matter was heard on 21st November, 2011 but in absence of Annexure to the work order it was adjourned for hearing for today. 2. Learned Counsel submits that scope of work was to move goods from railway sliding within the factory premises to the place of storage within the same premises. Once this is the scope of work,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... below. 4. Heard both sides and perused the record. 5. The impugned order nowhere discloses about the scope of work embodied in the work order. The authority tried to make effort in para 10 of the order but has also not demonstrated the case of the Revenue with sound reason. When the authority passed the order on 16-10-2010 by that time, decision of the Tribunal in the aforesaid tw....