Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (8) TMI 554

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r cancellation of registration certificate on the ground that they were only undertaking up-linking services for which there was no service tax levy. As per the advice of their counsel, the applicant had again obtained registration under the category of "Business Support Service" w.e.f.1.5.2006. Since September 2006, the applicant is filing returns. In 2010, the audit party visited the applicant's premises. During scrutiny of the records, the said officers found that the applicant accounted the income under the head of "allotment of airtime and uplink income" covered under the category of "broadcasting service", came into effect from 16.7.2001. Accordingly, a show cause notice dt.22.10.2010 was issued proposing demand of service tax of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t from the beginning, they were not rendering any broadcasting service and therefore demand is not sustainable. He submits that they have paid service since 1.5.2006 under the category of Business Support Service. It is further submitted they paid Rs. 4,90,003/- which was not appropriated by the adjudicating authority and the demand is not properly quantified. It is also contended that reimbursement of loans were included in the demand. It is further submitted that entire demand is time-barred as there is no suppression of facts with intent to evade payment of tax. It is submitted that notice was served beyond the extended period of limitation of 5 years. It is submitted that notice was served on 24.10.2010 by affixing outside the office pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s letter of even number dated 3 rd June 2003 whereby permission was conveyed to M/s. Coxswain Technologies Ltd. to uplink your TV channels namely "COXSWAIN" from India through VSNL, Mumbai, the undersigned is directed to convey no objection of this Ministry to change the name of your channels from "COXSWAIN" to "SS MUSIC". All other terms & conditions, as contained in the permission letter dated 3.6.2003, would continue to apply.' On perusal of the above letter, we find that the applicant got the permission to up-link their own TV channels. It is noted that P&L Account for the year ending 31.3.2005 showed fees for allotment of airtime and up-linking charges separately. Thus it is clear that applicant had been collecting fees for allo....