2014 (8) TMI 88

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., in brief, are that the appellants were engaged in the manufacture of Supari classified under Chapter Sub-heading No. 2106.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They cleared supari on payment of duty after availing cenvat credit on the inputs. A show cause notice dated 29.02.2000, was issued proposing to deny the cenvat credit of Rs . 12,82,714/- as wrongly availed by them for payment of dut....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ehalf of the Revenue and on perusal of the records, I find that the appellants availed cenvat credit on the inputs and cleared Supari on payment of duty. The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that as per the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of M/s. Crane Betel Nut Powder Works Vs. CCE, Tirupathi 2009 (210) ELT 171 (S.C.), the final product supari is not dutiable and therefore the app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g.)     d) A One Laminators Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CC 2012 (276) ELT 172 (Del.)     e) Bhushan Steel Ltd. Vs. CCE, Ghaziabad 2014 (299) ELT 254 (Tri.-Del.) 5. In the case of Narmada Chematur Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (supra), the Honble Supreme Court held that the amount of cenvat / modvat credit wrongly availed is exactly equivalent to the amount of excise duty paid by no....