2014 (8) TMI 31

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ajesh Poojary. JUDGMENT :- P.C: 1. Having heard Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant/Revenue and Mr. Mistry, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Respondent/Assessee we are of the view that the Revenue projects both questions which are framed at paragraph 4 at page 4 as substantial questions of law, but the Appeal deserves admission only on the first question.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rovisions of Section 44B are not applicable?" 3. In relation to that we must note that the concurrent findings of fact are based on a peculiar position. The Appeal is preferred by the Revenue to question a finding and in relation to the Assessee which is a Company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. It is engaged inter-alia in the business of refining crude oil. The Assessee entere....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mmissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. In fact the question of law and projected at paragraph 4(ii) arises out of payment of demurrage. That is reimbursed to the supplier of crude oil. It is in the nature of reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of the Assessee. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal found that this ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y, paid or payable, whether in or out of India, to the Assessee or to any person on his behalf on account of the carriage of passengers, livestock, mail or goods shipped at any port in India and secondly, received or deemed to be received in India by or on behalf of the Assessee on account of the carriage of passengers, livestock, mail or goods shipped at any port outside India. 5. In the prese....