Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1974 (12) TMI 68

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....petitions are completely concluded by our earlier decisions in Special Civil Application No. 780 of 1970, decided on April 28, 1971, where I spoke for the Division Bench consisting of myself and A.D. Desai J. In that decisions this metallised yarn in the form of thin strips of laminated polyester film was, on a harmonious interpretation of both the Entries 15A(2) and 18, by keeping them in their r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....film has been held not to attract Tariff Item 18 as synthetic fibrous yarn, and is held to be covered by Entry 15A(2) as an article of polyester, whether laminated or not. In that view of the matter no difference has been made out which would justify and different interpretation in this case. The second ground raised by Mr. Vakharia was the same ground which has been turned down in these two earli....