2014 (7) TMI 1007
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., he has purchased hydraulic excavator. While it was being transported, the first respondent intercepted the vehicle with the excavator and initiated proceedings under section 47 of the KVAT Act, 2003. That resulted in an order imposing penalty of Rs. 13,13,830. Appeal filed before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) was rejected. Therefore, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribun....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... case was adjourned for the Government Pleader to obtain instructions. Accordingly, she has obtained instructions and it is submitted that the Department has decided to file revision against exhibit P1 order before this court and that it was therefore that exhibit P2 request of the petitioner was not considered. As already stated, exhibit P1 order was rendered by the Tribunal on November 30, 20....
TaxTMI