2014 (7) TMI 942
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Appeal No. 656 of 2014 - -<br>Service Tax<br>M. R. Shah And K. J. Thaker,JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr. Hasit Dilip Dave For the Respondent : Mr. Yogesh Ravani ORDER (Per : Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Shah) 1. In the facts and circumstances of the case, as we propose to dispose of the present Tax Appeals by granting the respective appellants an additional opportunity to deposit the a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t the respective appellants did not comply with the said order and, therefore, by impugned orders the learned CESTAT has dismissed the appeals on non-compliance of the orders of pre-deposit. 4. Today, when the present Tax Appeals are taken up for further hearing, Shri Hasit Dave, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respective appellants has requested to grant some more time to the appel....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 5. Shri Ravani, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent has requested to pass an appropriate order in the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly when the respective appellants have now agreed to make the deposit of Rs. 1.50 Crores as pre-deposit directed by CESTAT earlier, though belatedly. 6. Heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pplications/stay orders i.e. Rs. 1.20 Crores to be deposited on or before 30/09/2014 and the balance amount of Rs. 30 lakhs to be deposited on or before 15/10/2014 and on producing compliance of the same before CESTAT, the learned CESTAT is directed to decide and dispose of the respective appeals in accordance with law and on its own merits. If the aforesaid amount of Rs. 1.50 Crores is deposited ....
TaxTMI