2014 (7) TMI 940

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i Associates For the Respondents :Mr. V. Sundareswaran ORDER The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition challenging the show cause notice dated 16.12.2013 issued by the first respondent. In and by the said notice, the petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why the amount of Rs. 18,32,782/- sanctioned and paid to them by the second respondent be not recovered under Sec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ication was pending, the second respondent issued a notice calling upon the petitioner as to why the arrears shall not be recovered from the rebate claims to be sanctioned to them. The petitioner, on receipt of the notice, appeared for a personal hearing on 08.06.2012 and only informed that the application for stay is pending before the CESTAT, Chennai. As there was no interim stay granted, while ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... In the meantime, a letter dated 05.10.2012 was issued to the petitioner seeking to recover the interest, against which WP No. 28776 of 2012 was filed and interim stay was granted by this Court. During the pendency of the writ petition, the CESTAT, Chennai has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner on 25.05.2013. According to the respondents, in order to avoid time bar demand in future, they....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ir explanation. The petitioner, instead of submitting their objections has rushed to this Court by filing this writ petition. The learned counsel for the respondents therefore prayed this Court to dismiss the writ petition. 5. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned standing counsel for the respondents. As rightly pointed out by the learned standing counsel for the....