TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2014 (7) TMI 864
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rned CIT(A)-II, Lucknow has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs. 21,06,582/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained capital contribution by Smt. Sindhuja Mishra, one of the partners. He failed to appreciate that capital introduced is unaccounted money stated to be received from persons who are merely name lenders. In these circumstances, the Assessing Officer was justified to inquire into the source of the source of funds. 2. Any other ground which may be taken at the time of hearing." 3. Learned D.R. of the Revenue supported the assessment order. He also placed reliance on the following judicial pronouncements: (i) Girish Narain Vs Commissioner of Income-tax [2005] 274 ITR 405 (All) (ii) Co....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....igh Court is not applicable. 6. Before us, reliance was placed by Learned D.R. of the Revenue on another judgment of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court rendered in the case of Jagmohan Ram Chandra vs. CIT (Supra). In that case, the amount being two cash credits in the books of the firm in the name of two partners were added in the hands of the firm as well as in the hands of the concerned partners and still, it was held by Hon'ble Allahabad High Court that the Tribunal was justified in upholding the addition in the total income of the assessee firm even though said amount was also assessed in the hands of the two partners. Hence, in our considered opinion, this later judgment of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court is required to be follow....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ok. It is also seen that it is noted by CIT(A) on page No. 4 below this chart that during the course assessment proceedings, the assessee was required to furnish various details being copy of account of Smt. Sindhuja Mishra with IIHT Systems Ltd. and Senani Colonizers & Builders (P) Ltd. The assessee was also asked to furnish cash flow statement to show deposit of Rs. 1 lac in cash in her bank account but no compliance was made in this regard. Even as per remand report, it is reported by the Assessing Officer that the evidence filed by the assessee are insufficient to prove the genuineness of the sources. A clear finding is given by CIT(A) in para 4.5 of his order that the source for the capital contribution of Smt. Sindhuja Mishra with the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....oss account (excluding bank interest & depreciation). 4. Any other ground which the appellant may take during the course of hearing with the kind permission of the Hon'ble Tribunal." 10. Regarding the Cross Objection filed by the assessee, it was submitted by Learned A.R. of the assessee that at least cheque received from these two companies i.e. M/s IIHT Systems Ltd. and M/s Senani Colonizers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. should be accepted as valid explanation. Regarding the remaining grounds, he fairly conceded that rejection of books has not been challenged. 11. Learned D.R. of the Revenue supported the order of learned CIT(A). 12. We have considered the rival submissions. We find that a clear finding is given by CIT(A) in para 4....