Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (7) TMI 846

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the assessment year 2006-07, claiming the following questions of law:      "(i) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Haryana Tax Tribunal was right in dismissing the appeal being barred by limitation as it did not condone the delay caused on account of misguidance of the chartered accountant which misguided itself with provision of section 33(6) instead of section 33(5) of the Act that the appeal can be filed in 180 days instead of 60 days?      (ii) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Haryana Tax Tribunal was right in not appreciating that the appellate authority was wrong in not providing an opportunity to the appellant to plead its case before the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gineers was engaged in the job-work of painting and powder coating and the material used for execution was being supplied by the contractee and it was providing only labour job. The appellant had been filing returns and discharging its obligations, if any, though there was no tax liability as there was no transfer of property in goods. The assessment for the year 2006-07 was framed by the assessing authority ex parte vide order dated March 22, 2010 (annexure A1). The notice was pasted on the last known business address whereas the appellant had already closed its business on March 31, 2008. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant filed an appeal before the appellate authority who vide order dated June 20, 2011 (annexure A2) dismissed the appeal. S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....seek remedy without delay. The idea is that every legal remedy must be kept alive for a period fixed by the Legislature. To put it differently, the law of limitation prescribes a period within which legal remedy can be availed for redress of the legal injury. At the same time, the courts are bestowed with the power to condone the delay, if sufficient cause is shown for not availing the remedy within the stipulated time.      15. The expression 'sufficient cause' employed in section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and similar other statutes is elastic enough to enable the courts to apply the law in a meaningful manner which sub serves the ends of justice. Although, no hard-and-fast rule can be laid down in dealin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... dealt with by the court as such." It was also recorded that:      "For the aforestated reasons, we hold that in each and every case the court has to examine whether delay in filing the special leave petition stands properly explained. This is the basic test which needs to be applied. The true guide is whether the petitioner has acted with reasonable diligence in the prosecution of his appeal/petition . . ." 7. From the above, it emerges that the law of limitation has been enacted which is based on public policy so as to prescribe time-limit for availing of legal remedy for redressal of the injury caused. The purpose behind enacting law of limitation is not to destroy the rights of the parties but to see that th....