2014 (7) TMI 761
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... The appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-II, Chennai, dated 11-11-2013 relevant to the Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10. The only issue in appeal is deleting of dis-allowance made u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as 'the Act') for non-deduction of tax at source on the overseas payment of agency commission.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ecision of the Tribunal in the cases of M/s.Farida Shoes P. Ltd., (ITA No.359 & 360/Mds/2013) decided on 11-04-2013 and in the case of ACIT Vs. Delta Shoes P. Ltd., (ITA No.909/Mds/2013) decided on 31-07-2013, the CIT(Appeals) deleted the addition. 3. Shri Guru Bhashyam, appearing on behalf of the Department assailing the order of CIT(Appeals) vehemently supported the assessment order and reite....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....utside the Indian territory. The CIT(Appeals) in his order has given a categoric finding that the facts in the present case are similar to facts and circumstances in the case of M/s.Farida Shoes P. Ltd., (supra). The payments to non-residents for procuring export orders are not assessable to tax in India. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of GE Technology Cen. P. Ltd., Vs. CIT repo....
TaxTMI