Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (7) TMI 651

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssing of Velvet/Corduroy cloth. The demand of duty of Rs. 13,15,227.30 was confirmed against them on the allegations and findings of clandestine clearance of goods under pseudo cover of private challans/bailing slips of their principal manufacturer M/s. J.K. Woollen & Silk Mils, (M/s. JKWSM), who is engaged in trading of such goods. It is seen that after due adjudication, the demand was confirmed along with imposition of penalties. The said orders were challenged by the respondents before the Tribunal, who vide their Final Order No.A/1064/02-NB(D), dated 27.09.2002, set aside the confirmation and remanded the matter to the lower authorities for fresh decisions. For better appreciation, the Tribunals order is reproduced below:-  &nbsp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s made much stress on the statement of Sachin Talwar, partner of the appellant firm who admitted that his firm had been receiving the goods from Jagmohan Singh, proprietor of M/s. J.K. Woollen & Silk Mills and did not dispute the challans. But the adjudicating authority was required to examine as to when those goods were sent by M/s. J.K. Woollen & Silk Mills, to the appellants for job work and if so, how and in what manner. The appellant had taken the plea that whenever they received the goods for job work from M/s. J.K. Woollen & Silk Mills, they had been sending D.3 intimation to the department. They had also placed on record the copy of that intimation. The appellants have also produced certificates issued by various firms on behalf of ....