2014 (7) TMI 451

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent : Shri Prasad Praanjape, Adv. PER : Ashok Jindal Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order sanctioning the refund claim of the service tax paid by the respondent under Business Auxiliary Service. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent is providing Business Auxiliary Service to their principals located outside India by marketing their product in India. It is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....claim. 5. On the other hand, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that in fact, the recipient of services is located outside India and the service has also been received by him outside India. In these circumstances, it is a case of export as per Rule 3 (1) (iii) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005. Therefore, they are entitled for the refund claim. 6. Considered....