Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (7) TMI 197

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ioner (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: S S Kang: The appellants filed the appeals against the common impugned order, therefore, the applications are taken up together. 2. The appellants filed the stay applications for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax of Rs. 1,51,11,575/-, interest and penalties. The demand is confirmed on the ground that the appellants provided services of 'Club & Association&#....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T.R. 401 (Jhar.) held that the provisions of Sec. 65(25a) and Sec.65(105)(zzze) of the Finance Act as amended by the Finance Act, 2005 to the extent that the said provisions purport to levy service tax in respect of services purportedly provided by the petitioner club to its members is ultra vires. The contention is that in view of this decision, the demand is not sustainable. 5. Revenue relied....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nts were received as 'activity and maintenance charges'. As the appellants had not co-operated with the adjudicating authority, therefore, we find that it is a fit case to impose cost on the appellants. The appellants are directed to deposit Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) as cost with the jurisdictional Commissioner within four weeks from today. 8. As the impugned order is passed ex-....