2014 (6) TMI 827

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Motkari For the Respondent : None JUDGEMENT:- The Appellant is aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order passed by the Tribunal dismissing an application to modify its earlier interim direction. By the order under challenge delivered on 18th April 2012, the Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application for modification of its earlier order. 2. Mr. Motkari submits that the modificati....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....#39;s written request, the matter was postponed to 18th April 2012. On the postponed date, none appeared on behalf of the Appellant meaning thereby both the Appellant and Advocates were absent. In such circumstances, the Tribunal cannot be faulted for proceeding ex-parte. 4. Mr. Motkari, then, sought to argue that the interim direction in the earlier order is too harsh and virtually non-suits t....