2014 (6) TMI 827
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... JUDGEMENT:- The Appellant is aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order passed by the Tribunal dismissing an application to modify its earlier interim direction. By the order under challenge delivered on 18th April 2012, the Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application for modification of its earlier order. 2. Mr. Motkari submits that the modification application has been dismissed without h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed to 18th April 2012. On the postponed date, none appeared on behalf of the Appellant meaning thereby both the Appellant and Advocates were absent. In such circumstances, the Tribunal cannot be faulted for proceeding ex-parte. 4. Mr. Motkari, then, sought to argue that the interim direction in the earlier order is too harsh and virtually non-suits the Appellant. On perusal of the order delivered....