Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (6) TMI 67

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appeal against the impugned order for confirming the penalties imposed against them under section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. 2. Brief facts of the case are that during the period 2006-07 to 2009-2010, the appellant was providing the services of glass wool coating to the sugar factories. At the time of audit in a sugar factory, it came to the knowledge of the department that the su....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant is not disputing the liability of service tax and the interest. They are only disputing the levy of penalties imposed under section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act. It is contended on behalf of the appellant that the penalties under section 76 and 78 of the Finance Act were imposed simultaneously. As per the decision of the Hon'ble Karnat....