2014 (6) TMI 59

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate ORDER Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. 1. Photo copy of receipt dated 12.5.2014 showing deposit of Rs. 20 lacs produced today is taken on record. 2. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short, "the Act") against the order dated 5.3.2014 (Annexure A-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned by the respondent, the appellant appeared on 4.1.2011 and suffered the statement. On 19.4.2011, the premises of the appellant were visited and the record was resumed for further investigation. The statement of Sh. Haripal Dhiman was recorded on 4.7.2011 and on the same day, the appellant deposited Rs. 3 lacs vide cheque No. 540062 and Rs. 2 lacs vide cheque No. 540063. The respondent issued a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ee filed an appeal along with stay application (Annexure A-5) before the Tribunal. The Tribunal vide order dated 5.3.2014 (Annexure A-1) directed the appellant to deposit entire duty demand of Rs. 49,45,072/- along with interest except the amount already deposited by it. Hence, the present appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the requirement of Rs. 49,45,072/- along with ....