2014 (5) TMI 590
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Respondents : Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel, for Revenue. Mr. Amit Yadav, proxy for Ravinder Agarwal, CGSC for UOI. ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved by a draft order of Assessing Officer dated 10.03.2014 under Section 144C based upon the recommendations of the TPO. Initially, it was contended that no objections or reference can be made in re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the draft assessment order. The assessee also points out that in addition to the order of 10.03.2014, penalty orders (annexure P-2, 3 and 4 to the writ petition) for alleged violation of Section 92D leading to mandatory penalties under Section 271G, 271AA and 271BA of the Act, have also been passed. In view of the submissions of the respondents that petitioner is entitled to approach the DRP and....