2009 (12) TMI 901
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....his revision challenging the legality and correctness of the order passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, dated October 26, 2006 in S.T.A. Nos. 619-24/2001 raising the following substantial questions of law: "1. Whether the order passed by the Tribunal dated October 26, 2006 is in conformity with the order passed by this court in S.T.A. No. 121 of 2004 dated June 29, 2006 and W.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ng aggrieved by the orders passed by the suo motu revision petitioner, had filed an appeal before the Tribunal in S.T.A. Nos. 619-24 of 2001. The grounds urged therein were not only in regard to the jurisdiction exercising the revisional power by the authority and also on questioning the merits of the order passed in the revision petition. The appeal came to be allowed by the Tribunal by its order....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d to the Tribunal only to consider the question of jurisdiction of the revisional authority and was also required to consider the entire case of the parties afresh. We have perused the order passed by this court. In paras 7 and 9 this court without considering the merits of the matter has allowed the revision petition and remanded the matter to the Tribunal to consider all points. In para 7 it ....
TaxTMI