2011 (1) TMI 1266

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....einafter referred to as "the Act") is directed against the order of the Tribunal dated May 22, 2003 for the assessment year 1987-88, by which the Tribunal has confirmed the order of the first appellate authority deleting the penalty levied under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Central Act"). The brief facts of the case are that the assessee/opposi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... C has been misused and there was mens rea in issuing form C. Being aggrieved by the order of the assessing authority, the assessee filed an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals). The Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal and deleted the penalty. The order of the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) has been confirmed by the Tribunal. Heard Sri B.K. Pandey, learned standing cou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s, by which the assessee requested for the issue of form C. In the applications, the goods for which the form C was sought has not been mentioned. He further submitted that the impugned goods, namely, agarbatti, ayurvedic medicine, cosmetics, toilet goods and feeder remotely do not fall within the purview of the items mentioned in the registration certificate and, therefore, it is not the case of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... parties, I have perused the impugned order and considered the rival submissions. Admittedly, the assessee was registered for toilet soap, washing powder and confectionery under the Central Sales Tax Act during the year under consideration. The assessee was not registered for agarbatti, ayurvedic medicine, cosmetics, toilet goods and feeder. These goods remotely do not fall within the items men....