2011 (2) TMI 1307

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e accounts produced by the assessee ? (ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in sustaining the penalty in respect of estimated addition in view of Explanation to section 12(3)(b), which provides for deduction of tax due on the estimated turnover for the purpose of calculating penalty?" The brief facts are, the petitioner-assessee is a dealer in brasswares. It reported a total and taxable turnover of Rs. 7,93,057. The assessing authority determined the same at Rs. 8,98,897 and levied penalty of Rs. 430. While assessing the liability of tax, the assessing authority initially proposed to assess 70 per cent of the turnover at eight per cent under the residual entry of Part B of the First Schedule an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....be entertained. We heard Mr. Trilokchand Chapala, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Haja Naziruddin, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the question of law relating to bifurcation of the brasswares into domestic utensils and other wares based on item 7C of Part B of the First Schedule and the residuary item of the said Part of the First Schedule, is not under challenge. As far as the enhancement of the apportionment from 35:65 to 50:50, as held by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner is concerned, the learned counsel pointed out that while the assessing authority has given specific reasons for making the apportionment a....