2010 (12) TMI 1086
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Act, 1955 and is entitled to exhibit motion films in his cinema hall. A producer of Bhojpuri Film approached the petitioner for shooting a part of a feature film in his cinema hall. The petitioner sent an application before the District Magistrate, Gorakhpur/Licensing Authority informing that no shows of the film would be held on May 25, 2005 as the film was to be shot in the hall. No reply....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondent. The decision The Director of film "Bhandu" issued a policy decision of 2001 requiring the authorities to provide all facilities for promotion of shooting the films in U.P. Subsequently, he also sent a letter dated July 22, 2003 requesting the District Magistrate to provide facilities for shooting films in U.P. T....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....strate is satisfied that the proprietor of an entertainment has: * failed to give information; or * failed to prepare or to submit true and full returns; or * used or possesses duplicate tickets; or * fraudulently evaded or attempted to evade, the payment of tax due in any manner. A reading of section 12 indicates that the order under section 12 of the Act can be passed provi....
TaxTMI