2014 (4) TMI 986

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent. ORDER Heard Shri A.P. Mathur for the appellant and Shri B.K.S. Raghuvanshi for the respondents. 2. This appeal under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 5-7-2013, passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Excise Stay Application No. 55128 of 2013 in Appeal No. 55149 of 2013. 3.&e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to para 2.1 of the appellate order wherein it has been observed that the Cenvat credit has wrongly been utilised by the appellant. He submits that the allegation that the manufactured goods were never received by the appellant were all incorrect. He submits that all these issues have to be gone into and decided in the appeal and the Tribunal committed error in not waiving the pre-deposit of inte....