2014 (4) TMI 836
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....The appellants have made a request for adjournment. However, we find that matter has been repeatedly coming up on board and was being adjourned at the request of advocate of the appellant. As such, after rejecting the request of adjournment, we proceed to decide the stay petition after hearing the learned DR and after going through the impugned order. 2. The appellant was engaged in the manufac....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....as also by the decision of Hon'ble Himachal Pradesh High Court in the case of Auro Spg. Mills [2011 (187) ECR 308 (HP)]. 4. Further, such amendment in Rule 2(p) was taken note by the Division Bench of Tribunal in Shree Rajasthan Syntex Ltd. vs. CCE reported in [2011 (24) STR 670 (Tri-Del)] and it was held that inasmuch as there was no simultaneous amendment in the provisions of Rule 2(r) the ut....
TaxTMI