TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2009 (2) TMI 777
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....alue Added Tax Act, 2003. The petitioner, Mr. Krishna Pada Poddar, is the proprietor of M/s. Hi-Tech Engineering having its office at P-25, C.I.T. Road, Scheme-VII-M, Kolkata 700 054. The petitioner is registered under the West Bengal VAT Act, 2003 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 as a works contractor. In course of business the petitioner was sending a consignment of goods to M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., at their outlet at Haitgaon in Assam through vehicle No. WB-23A-9960. The said loaded truck was intercepted at Ghosh Pukur Check point on April 27, 2008 by the Assistant Sales Tax Officer, Siliguri Range (in short, the ASTO, SRG), respondent No. 1. On April 29, 2008 the consignment was seized for alleged contravention of secti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ieu of April 26, 2007) annexed at page 14 of the main application. The original purchase order is also enclosed at page 25. The learned advocate has admitted that the original purchase order dated March 27, 2008 was not handed over to the driver as the concerned authority of BPCL who was to issue the certificate was on leave, but the BPCL was in urgent need of completion of the job and therefore insisted on completing the job as early as possible, that is why the original purchase order could not be produced at the time of detention, seizure as well as at the time of imposition of penalty, but a certificate issued by the BPCL was produced at the time of seizure as well as at the time of hearing of penalty proceedings but the concerned autho....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssued by BPCL annexed at page 18 of the application states that "formal work order will be issued later on" while the purchase order No. 4502168557 annexed at page 25 reveals the date of purchase order is March 27, 2008. The learned State Representative has claimed that the contradictory statement was made by the petitioner to evade payment of tax. Even, it is argued by the learned State Representative, if it is a case of stock transfer no forwarding note/stock transfer note was issued by the petitioner as per provisions of section 81(l)(b) of the Act. The points of adjudication in this case are: (i) whether the disputed transaction is inter-State sale or stock transfer, and (ii) whether the required provisions under section 81 of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sale in course of execution of works contract. Here, the situs of sale is immaterial. The property in the goods used in the execution of works contract will be transferred to the purchaser after commissioning of the entire works contract. As such, the disputed transaction in the instant case is the deemed inter-State sale and as such, in the challan No. HE-266 dated April 24, 2008 and the consignment note No. 155 dated April 24, 2008, M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., New Retail outlet, Hatigaon, Gauhati, Assam was shown as consignee. Accordingly, the disputed transaction is covered under section 81(1)(a) of the West Bengal VAT Act, 2003. The consignee rightly issued way-bill received from the Government of Assam for importation of....