Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (8) TMI 1085

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....further addition at Rs. 5,54,800 to Rs. 27,586 on the ground that the assessee had paid huge amount of compounding fee for not carrying the bill is legally sustainable? (ii) Whether the reduction of second penalty by the Tribunal is valid in law? The assessee was engaged in manufacturing of silver anklets. The assessee reported a total and taxable turnover of Rs. 4,88,592 in form I for the assessment year 1994 to 1995. As against the assessee, the enforcement wing officials registered a case for transportation of 40.140 kgs of silver anklets which were not supported by any records and collected tax surcharge and compounding fee. When the enforcement wing officials inspected the place of business of the assessee on September 7, 1994, v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the said order of the Tribunal, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the State contended that compounding fee having not been reduced by the revisional authority, taking note of the equal addition and the consequent tax liability, there should have been no further indulgence shown to the assessee in the matter of equal addition. According to the learned Government Advocate, when the assessee failed to maintain the statutory account books and other records as expected of it, there was only justification for the assessing authority to have made an equal addition in order to ensure that there was no falsification of the accounts. The learned Government Advocate referred to the decision reported in Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in page No. 81. The relevant portion is extracted hereunder: ". . . While making reassessments on the basis of the information gathered from the bill book seized, the Sales Tax Officer rejected the accounts maintained by the assessee as unreliable and assessed the assessee on the basis of his 'best judgment'. The distinction between a 'best judgment' assessment and assessment based on the accounts submitted by an assessee must be borne in mind. Sometime there may be innocent or trivial mistakes in the accounts maintained by the assessee. There may be even certain unintended or unimportant omissions in those accounts; but yet the accounts may be accepted as genuine and substantially correct. In such cases, the assessmen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he must, their Lordships think, be able to take into consideration local knowledge and repute in regard to the assessee's circumstances, and his own knowledge of previous returns by and assessments of the assessee, and all other matters which he thinks will assist him in arriving at a fair and proper estimate; and though there must necessarily be guess-work in the matter, it must be honest guess-work." A reading of the principles set out by the honourable Supreme Court will make it clear that even while rejecting the account placed by the assessee as unreliable, while at the same time when the assessing officer gather very many details from the accounts as well as from other materials on which the assessing officer could place his ha....